Looking up those patents, the first alludes to a system where a player aims and fires an “item” toward a character in a field, and in doing so triggers combat, and then dives into extraordinary intricacies about switching between modes within this. The second is very similar, but seems more directly focused on tweaking previous patents to including being able to capture Pokémon in the wild, rather than only during battle. The third, rather wildly, seems to be trying to claim a modification to the invention of riding creatures in an open world and being able to transition between them easily.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not sure why you got downvoted, you’re absolutely right. While Nintendo is prolific in this subject, they’re far from unique.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Absolutely not true. All the console creators, sure, but not all developers. There are so many good developers, especially indie.

      There’s issues with purchasing anything in capitalism. We have to deal with that as long as that’s the case though. It doesn’t mean Nestlé isn’t significantly worse than other campanies though, for example. There are different degrees of bad, and Nintendo is basically the top for gaming.