• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, it’s a black and white position. You specifically are saying the state is unable to obtain justice because of the “risk”. You preclude the possibility of justice being obtained. I’m pretty amazed you can find so many ways to say the same thing and not realize that. But hey, I’m sure it’s just everybody else being irrational right?

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you think “black and white” just means that I have an opinion that I feel is correct?

      You preclude the possibility of justice being obtained.

      How did you even possibly get this from what I’ve said? I feel that allowing free speech is justice.

      I’m sure it’s just everybody else being irrational right?

      Not one person has yet actually asked me to clarify my position. You’ve all only told me what I really mean. So yes - it is everyone else being irrational.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is how people figure out how each other think, calm down.

        It does seem you are saying governments shouldnt be permitted to seek justice against misinformation because doing so puts a greater injustice on the public as a whole.

        Thats me rephrasing your point from earlier to see if I understand it right, so if I have it wrong feel free to explain.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        So… After being asked by multiple people to clarify your position, you’re not going to after all?