PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 21 days agoI was only gone for a day or two...locklemmy.worldimagemessage-square898fedilinkarrow-up1637arrow-down126
arrow-up1611arrow-down1imageI was only gone for a day or two...locklemmy.worldPM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 21 days agomessage-square898fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·20 days ago That’s a very basic and low IQ comment. I suggest you look up how economics work. this is handwaving, not evidence for your position
minus-squarex00za@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down8·20 days agoThen don’t use that stupid argument. You think iPhones are “already made” and it won’t make Apple a big company if you buy one?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·20 days agoiphones were made before anyone ever bought one. that’s how linear time works.
minus-squarex00za@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·20 days agoOh no, I’m just so used to that stupid “question” or “statement” that it’s become obvious it’s absolutely meaningless. My answer is this: You’re paying for them to kill the next one. So “already dead” is ignorant if you don’t know how linear time works.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·20 days agoit’s a legitimate objection unless you can show causation
minus-squarex00za@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·20 days agoYou should use your knowledge in words for something productive instead.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·20 days agoif you don’t have evidence for your position, that is good reason to suspect it is not valid. a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, after all.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·20 days agoI haven’t made an argument. I’m rebutting yours. this, too, is not evidence for your position
minus-squarex00za@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·20 days agoOh no, I’m just so used to that stupid “question” or “statement” that it’s become obvious it’s absolutely meaningless. My answer is this: You’re paying for them to kill the next one. So “already dead” is ignorant if you don’t know how linear time works.
this is handwaving, not evidence for your position
Then don’t use that stupid argument.
You think iPhones are “already made” and it won’t make Apple a big company if you buy one?
iphones were made before anyone ever bought one. that’s how linear time works.
Oh no, I’m just so used to that stupid “question” or “statement” that it’s become obvious it’s absolutely meaningless.
My answer is this: You’re paying for them to kill the next one. So “already dead” is ignorant if you don’t know how linear time works.
it’s a legitimate objection unless you can show causation
You should use your knowledge in words for something productive instead.
if you don’t have evidence for your position, that is good reason to suspect it is not valid. a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, after all.
I haven’t made an argument. I’m rebutting yours. this, too, is not evidence for your position
Oh no, I’m just so used to that stupid “question” or “statement” that it’s become obvious it’s absolutely meaningless.
My answer is this: You’re paying for them to kill the next one. So “already dead” is ignorant if you don’t know how linear time works.