I needed to add a custom System Request (Sys Req or SysRq) to a linux kernel some time ago. While doing so, I dug deep into how it works and I thought I’d make a quick post about it. Here is a good SuperUser answer about what a SysRq is. You may also know about SysRq via REISUB. This post has three parts: how to raise a SysRq, how SysRq works (looking into kernel code), and how to add your own SysRq.
  • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
    0·
    5 months ago

    I love abusing sigusr1 and 2. Absolutely no confusion or shooting myself in the foot in 3 months when I forget what I did… No sir

    • Juno@beehaw.org
      01·
      5 months ago

      Let’s talk about how I don’t like Linus tech tips again. I know your can’t wrap your mind around me having my own opinion and posting one sentence about it

      THIS IS MUCH BETTER

      • ahto@discuss.tchncs.de
        1·
        5 months ago

        Yeah you’re really showing them how you have the moral high ground by following them to other posts and harassing them there… ???

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    0·
    5 months ago

    Huh, I never actually gave any thought to how the SysRq key works. Interesting thing to learn after all these decades, heh

    • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
      0·
      5 months ago

      https://lwn.net/Articles/296738/

      Unix internals is a great book! If you haven’t had an occasion to read it, I can’t recommend it highly enough. Similar to design of the BSD operating system, it goes into the internal data structures, but most importantly the rationale

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        0·
        5 months ago

        I actually don’t know nearly enough about OS design, and I’ve been toying with the idea of learning more for like 20 years now but never manage to get around to it. How’s that book hold up, considering it was (apparently?) published in '96? I’d assume a lot of the basics are still the same, and since it’s a book about the “evolution” of UNIX the historical parts will still be interesting in any case

        • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
          0·
          5 months ago

          The design of the BSD operating system is more narrative friendly, easier to read just for fun

          Unix internals keeps getting updates, but is far more technically applied. And probably easier to become outdated.

          From a philosophy perspective both books are great but if you could only read one I would recommend the BSD book. I know the Linux kernel and the BSD kernel have divergent development, but as far as posix structures are concerned they’re pretty similar

          • Juno@beehaw.org
            0·
            5 months ago

            I’ll set aside a whole day for you to talk about me not liking Linus tech tips if you like.

            Let’s dive deep!

            • UlrikHD@programming.devEnglish
              1·
              5 months ago

              Please refrain from harassing our users, keep whatever argument you have contained to the thread it started. Following and harassing users across communities/instances is not tolerated.

              You will only be given a temporary ban of one week from our instance, but if it continues after that it will changed to a permanent ban.