• archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Offensive: “christians believe that an imaginary flying bearded man in the sky speaks to them”

    Bigoted: “Muslims are barbaric murderers that will kill you for showing a picture of their prophet”

    You see the difference there?

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      But christians are barbaric murderers who will kill you for not converting to Christianity. I am not sure which of us is more confused.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago
        • Only one of those groups is subject to violent marginalization in the western world on the basis of their belief
        • It is possible to be bigoted/prejudiced against multiple groups of people at the same time

        I am quite sure it’s you who is confused.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Can you expand on this point? It’s not immediately clear what difference you are trying to highlight.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        One is mocking the belief of a group by portraying it as ridiculous, the other is a bigoted portrayal of a group as homicidal on the basis of their belief.

        The meme isn’t offensive toward ‘religious fruitcakes’ (the use of this word is kinda ironic but unrelated), it’s actively bigoted and Islamophobic. Socsa was presumably defending the meme by saying they enjoy offending all religions and not just islam, and I was pointing out that the post wasn’t simply offensive, it was bigoted.

        Edit: responding here because this post was removed on my home instance for Islamophobia.


        you’re still coming across to me as just saying “it’s never ok to criticize bad Islamic practices, it’s automatically bigotry.

        It isn’t a critique, it is portraying Muslims as fanatical murderers.

        I assume you find the practice of brutally murdering people for the act of drawing a picture of a fictional character to be bad. How would you phrase a legitimate criticism of the practice without being bigoted?

        In the same way that you would ‘critique’ Christianity, which justifies acts of terror such as bombing PFP clinics with Genesis 9:6, or Romans 13.

        Extremists in Christianity are not seen as representative of the faith, but they are for Islam.