• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So it doesn’t actually work well when you say that the claim without source was debunked… And you also don’t provide source.

    Whatchoo talking about, bro?

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The meme itself is not even a source.

      Like, me saying I had lunch with sasquatch is not something someone needs to rigorously debunk.

      • yokonzo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I mean I get what you’re saying but… One is a hairy apeman people claim to see in the woods, the other is companies doing something unethical and shady to improve their bottom line which there is absolutely precedent for.

        Yeah it’s unlikely this story is real but your analogy makes no sense

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Both are things people will believe without evidence because they want to believe it.

          A hairy ape man in the woods is cool. Shitting on businesses is cool.