Cool ad?

It seriously cannot get any worse. Bring on users from any platform. Lemmy sucks and i thank the mods of smaller subs that post diligently about enthusiast topics to add content that isnt dystopian sad sack circlejerk

If you dont know you have the option of not commenting

Here, here!

Warning: the following opinion has not been approved by Lemmy.

Meta has done a lot for VR and the tech is just getting started.

Well its shorter

Ai is not inherently corporate, but i get what you mean and why you might opt for non-ai content. You do run the risk of losing me as a friend though, because ai is cool.

If a single post with ten downvotes necessitates such a paradigm shift then by all means.

So is the rule going to say “no ai, unless we cant tell”? Or are you going to leave that up to interpretation?

Its a meme of an ideology to combat ai for its own sake, and that appears to be what this is about given your responses to the original commenter.

It makes sense to combat ai in this community if it creates a lot of bad content. Curious how much ai content you’ve successfully identified, or if you would allow content that was aided by ai but then further developed.

Just doesnt seem super enforceable, and it doesnt really make sense to me. The low effort raw prompt output is one thing, ai all together is another.

Bad moderating.

This is really stupid.

Im at a perfect equilibrium of indifference for being laid off. Some jobs suck.

To be impartial, he has a fishing yacht, hospital yacht, research yacht. Seems like these are probably floating businesses? Anyone know in what capacity he uses them?

Does bezos lease out his yacht to customers to help pay for itself or are these literally just sitting and being maintained for personal use? I guess i dont really know much about yachts.

Your name contains the name gabe.

Who is bending to corporate interests NOW??

What proposal? I dont know what you are talking about.

I want truth.

Yep there might be plenty we disagree with regarding their investments and their affect on the environment but we are just lying to ourselves to say people arent making a living due to some of those investments, having our lives enriched, and generally benefitting us in ways we would demand to keep if they were all magically erased.

Kind of useless to talk about this in any way to come to a sentimental conclusion though because we arent looking at a distribution of data to inform us what generates the most environmental impact and how much value we actually get from it each investment. Its just a big ambigious number until we look into it. Which we wont. Because nobody here actually cares enough.

But duuuude when you say “burn to” you are using the terminology you say is incorrect. You would have to say “from this cd im burning a copy” and yet you yourself are using the verbiage “burning to” which directly implies the original cd is being burned [to a copy].

The whole point is that people used burning as a short way of saying what you are saying is correct. People made burn into a verb as a replacement for copy. Its the same thing as saying im burning this data… because you are indeed burning the data onto a copy. People can say “im burning this disc” to mean the same thing this is fucking stuuuuuupid

Edit: its like “im tattooing a tribal pattern onto this guys ass” is the same as “im tattooing a tribal pattern”

Does that mean someone is tattooing something onto a tribal pattern? No!!! Go away please

Thank you!!! Lets get the fuck out of here

When you say “…he means burning to a blank CD.”

You are burning what onto a blank CD? The data from the original CD? So you are saying he means to burn the original CD to a blank CD? In other words:

“I burned this CD [to a blank CD].”

Seriously this is pointless please set me free.

Friend with baggy jeans and a System of a Down CD says: “hey i dont have a computer, can you burn this disc?”

Is he an idiot? Does he not truly know what he is talking about? Can i stop replying to this comment chain?