What have you read or where did you get your understanding from?
Ok but socdem. And before you try to make a counter argument with [insert nordic country that is actually capitalist] just think about how they always call the ussr and china communist while they arent.
What are you trying to say?
That’s my point. It’s all about doing self-interested things like mutual aid. Mutual defense is in my self-interest. A dairy co-operative is in the farmers’ interest. Zebras move in herds because it is in their mutual self-interest.
The initial comment is saying communism is about self-sacrifice, against human nature. Kropotkin (I’ve read the book three times btw) convincing makes the case that it’s the opposite of self-sacrifice: about pursuing our natural mutual interest according to our evolutionary imperatives. Kropotkin would say that ruthless competition is against our evolutionary nature and imperatives because it disadvantages survival.
the initial argument only applies to Utopian Socialism anyway – fighting for your personal interest is exactly the point of communism, destroying all the enemies of the working class
A lot of do-gooders from rich countries who think they’re adopting poor babies are unwitting kidnappers.
authoritarianism has worked for thousands of years.
What your Trump-supporting journalist says –
Behind the scenes is China’s reluctance to forgive debt…
In the past under such circumstances, big government lenders such as the U.S., Japan and France would work out deals to forgive some debt, with each lender disclosing clearly what they were owed and on what terms so no one would feel cheated. But China didn’t play by those rules.
The actual facts –
Of all the things to turn into a nation-v-nation contest, saving our shared atmosphere is the silliest.
Ok, your BBC link has persuaded me to do a 180° on my opinion
A critical mass is needed for major political changes.
For a referendum that’s 50%+1, but for organic political changes I’ve seen, like when my country legalised abortion or gay marriage or stopped The Troubles, you need a broad consensus.
It’s hard to quantify a broad consensus, but it’s certainly not 2 opponents to each proponent.
One third is a small minority as political support goes.
story is from 2013
dunno why they’re acting like “a guy called a guy fat in 2013” is a story
In the mid 20th-century, people reliably got more petty bourgeois as they got older.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379422000452