• 0 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 7th, 2024

help-circle
  • Fair enough. Yeah, I never thought of open and closed source as two exclusive options, but two of many.

    I myself publish an application which isn’t open source, but I publish the source code, as I believe my users have the right to know what runs on their computer, and have the freedom to audit, modify, and compile their own builds if they so wish. But I don’t want someone to take and resell my application. I have yet to encounter someone calling my app closed source, but I can see how someone could.





  • I don’t dispute Brave may be private in the current version, but with all the things they did they are not trustworthy, with many write ups online, some going as far as to call it malware. You are of course free to disagree, if you don’t think your browser adding extra tracking to your links is a deal breaker.

    I don’t know where you are reading that Vivaldi is closed source. The source code is right here: https://vivaldi.com/source/

    It does have fingerprinting protection, it has blocking trackers and ads built-in, and you can enable site isolation and turn off third party cookies if you choose to.


  • I’ve never heard of Cromite so don’t have an opinion, but Brave is super shady, with crypto-shilling, ad-injecting, adding tracking codes to clicked URLs that didn’t have them, something so privacy ruining you’d be better of using Chrome. They can’t be trusted, and I’m not even getting to the CEO being a questionable figure. Nobody should use it, let alone anyone caring about privacy. People prioritizing privacy should be using Firefox or Vivaldi, both privacy focused browsers.

    Vivaldi is not closed source. It’s not open source either (they don’t accept PRs), but the source is available.













  • dev_null@lemmy.mltoGames@sh.itjust.works*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Wikipedia has rules that a topic has to have some level of relevance to be added. While a major video game character can have enough relevance, an article for a random piece of scenery or for a “rusty dagger” item from some game would never be allowed.

    Game wikis also often have unique features, for example for showing item stats or have a look and feel that fits the game.