the $20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from google should be rolling in any day now

surely you don’t go to the comments section because you want to see comments? you go there because you want post recommendations, right? please click on the recommended posts

always remember, <=> is the three-way comparison operator. it takes two arguments.

what about haskell

no it does not. it’s basically just a poll to see what other countries think. at least, that’s my understanding based on what i’ve read.

sources:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly
• https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1bnissh/eli5_what_happens_if_a_country_doesnt_abide_by_un/
• https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/9/19/unga-resolution-against-palestine-occupation-will-it-change-anything

edit: formmatting. also i should clarify that reddit isn’t a particularly reliable source, but i included it because the top comments on that post agree with the other sources linked, and give provide simple answers to the question

Treat OR NO Trick

it’s actually impossible to be bilingual because you can only ever be speaking at most one language at a time

depends on the context, but σ is most often used to denote a member of a permutation group

it’s very telling that being pro palestine is immediately interpreted as being “anti israel”

There is only two ways to protect a game against piracy, right? Either you don’t, or use our protection

this is the most denuvo quote i could possibly think of. it’s beyond parody, and yet, they went and said it anyway

the belief that a quick 3 second rinse will kill off bacteria seems to be consistent with the ways that most people try to wash their hands

i haven’t had any problems with giant cockroaches ever since i started cutting all the tags off my shirts

so, people walking

i’ve been clutching my pearls for the past 10 years but it’s nice to know i can rest easy tonight

before gödel’s theorems can be formally stated, you have to make a lot of assumptions about axioms, and you have to pick which kinds of logical rules are “valid”, etc. and that all feels way more dicey to me than the actual content of gödels theorems.

i definitely agree that gödels theorems can help to undercut the idea that math is this all knowing, objective thing and there’s one right way to do everything. but to me personally, i feel like the stuff that’s very close to the foundations is super sketchy. there are no theorems at that level, it’s just “we’re going to say these things are true because we think they are probably true”.

how does that follow from Gödel’s incompleteness theorems?

sovereign citizen

basically people who think the legal system has hidden cheat codes, and if you can say the magic words then all of a sudden certain laws no longer apply to you

the math/philosophy overlap in set theory/logic makes me uneasy. the closer you get to it, the more the idea that “math is objective” starts to fade away. also pretty surreal to be learning philosophy/taking things as given in a math class. especially because you spend a lot of time proving that certain things are true, but you don’t ever say what it means for something to be true.

i couldn’t even make it through the 8 second video. i cant begin to imagine what you must have gone through. my heart goes out to you

that has not stopped me from calling it out. in my experience, most people seem to be unaware that it bothers other people (or at least they claim to be unaware).

that said, a decent number of them are unwilling to change their behavior after being told that it does bother people.