It’s not distance to mirror, it’s the focal length. The focal length of our eyes is static

Not a universal rule, however. Theres the whole concept of “optimizing yourself out of the fun” and what not in video games. Or the hardships being part of what makes a game fulfilling. It depends on what your goal is

What about the publisher take two tho

The big difference is that the DayZ standalone title was controlled by Bohemia Interactive, Rocketwerkz meanwhile is Dean’s studio.

I mean, I get that I don’t have an insider view or anything, but Rocketwerkz has proven itself reliable

In addition, DayZ is like a decade or more old, even in the worst case things might just change

They are also incredibly transparent on their discord. Feel free to join it and look at what the devs are saying for more info!

I see this myth everywhere, but what is it based on? They’re still actively updating Stationeers and ICARUS

Just look at their update history of you don’t believe me

But have you considered that the action of changing the time requires you to make a choice, get up, shift context, actually do it, then shift back, tiring you out?

This was made by the mental illness gang

(send help /j)

Really, we should just work towards keeping the world population stable and bring everyone out of poverty

Not that we have to try particularly hard, the population is stabilizing off by itself

We’re 8 billion people on the planet, we aren’t running out anytime soon

deleted by creator

The anti-mirror test

Well, there’s a reason old ships had people high up as scouts. These days we just use radar and gps

I guess they really want deadlock to succeed

Bruh are you living under a rock? It’s constantly in the local news where I live, it’s very much controversial

That’s more than I pay for unlimited gigabit here wtf 😭

I don’t see why it matters though? You’re not gonna be playing the game on your phone with limited data

Indeed, and the reason why I think the incompleteness theorems are the nail in the coffin, is that otherwise you could at least prove that certain sets of axioms worked together, then you’d have some basis for the math you use, even if it was self-referential

But it turns out that is impossible, and what we choose as our foundation for the math we use is pretty much arbitrary. Although of course we have reasons to use what we use

Godel’s second theory of incompleteness states that a formal system cannot prove its own consistency

I think that’s as close as you can get to “math is not objective”

We already know that math isn’t objective due to Godel’s incompleteness theorem

I do find it amazing that it was literally easier to send humans to the moon than faking it in 1969

Like, isn’t that an astonishing fact?

Not in Diablo, but in strategy games or stuff like MOBAs or shooters? Yeah, I do