• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • Conventional weapons can reduce hoards to manageable amount. And a zombie dragging itself across the ground is much easier to deal with.

    If I saw thousands of zombies, a machine gun is what I want. Aim head at the average head height, and make the barrels smoke. It’s not suppressing fire, it’s crowd management.

    Remember you can spike a zombie on the ground easier than when they are standing. Immobilise, THEN neutralise.


  • Artillery and bombs can shred/destroy the body, making it hard to move, if there is enough body left to move.

    A .50 to the arm isn’t going to slow a zombie down, but the knee? Kinda hard to walk with one leg. 25mm chain gun is probably going to mist a few bodies.

    Artillery is an area denial weapon. If you have a hoard a couple 105 shells are going to take apart rotten flesh with ease. Mortars are similar and more mobile.

    Mine fields are effective as a way to immobilise and thin the herd.

    Choke points work exceptionally well, and claymores can be rigged at head height.

















  • HikingVet@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldI was only gone for a day or two...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hey look, your Wikipedia link says the nutrients cats need from meat can be synthesised in literally the second sentence.

    This is what I was referring to.

    I wasn’t making an argument either way. You asked for someone to help you with your homework and I gave you a place to start with the understanding that you were going to apply critical thinking and check source material after being shown a direction.

    You want to bitch about having to think and do work? Stop getting into these types of discussions. I made no claims as to validity just that a quick search revealed many sources and articles that had info you were looking for.

    Edit: spelling and grammar.