My in laws have a pigeon problem.

Can I borrow the prototype?

So did you.

US agreed to bring it before the UNSC, not to protect them. Russia has veto powers.

'93 Budapest memorandum off the top of my head if anyone wants to look it up and bring the quote forward.

We did hold up our end.

We brought it before the UNSC, Russia vetoed any proposal. That was our agreement, Russia did not hold up theirs.

This is why the VETO power needs to go.

America promised to bring it before the UNSC, which they did.

93 Budapest memorandum if you wanna read

Knew I was missing something.

Kinda seems like a moot clause considering Russia has veto powers in the UNSC.

And that the US would protect them if attacked.

'93 Budapest protocol I believe

Better have angry marines

Didn’t we do this in COD 2? Might have been 1.

Though it started with lion king.

Nope

Looked through history, they aren’t a bot.

Did you look, or just assume because you disagree?

Apparently that doesn’t matter.

Good on you for looking at facts that support you objectively.

Sorry, hands busy

Depends on your defined of terrorism, and what these actions are.

The usual one i see is to the effect of “non state actor using violence against a civilization population to further political objectives”. By that one:

• no, Israel is a state

• violence, yes.

• civilian population is a maybe, depending on your definition of Hezbollah actions and position. Are they civilians, combatants, terrorists themselves?

• further political objectives is likely, however I don’t see what the objective is. Kill people we don’t like is murder, not terrorism.

Of note, if its not a terrorist act it could very well be an act of war, invoking the right of self defense (Art 30???). If so, and civilian casualties weren’t minimized its leading towards war crime territory. I wouldn’t say it was - small explosive, on an object usually carried by the target, which was unlikely to be used by civilians.

Israel could use the same article to call this attack self defense against actions already taken. You can look at gulf War for the whole discussion around preemptive strikes for self defense.

Personally, I say no. Same way Chinese vessels “only” ramming and using waterguns on Philippine vessels isn’t terrorism.

That’s a very weak arguement - you’re communicating with the embassy and ambassador of a recognized country.

I would have called it a glass factory. Means I can snicker every time I tell someone.

Pagers are one directional, and cant be traced.

To view a different way, why do they have a pager, rather than just calling an embassy, “state department” or cell phone?

Headbangers was a great little addictive game.

There was arguement and reviews that COD 2 had overdone the first person shooter, and we were exhausted of the WW2 repeats.

Whats modern warfare, modern warfare (deliberately repeated), battlefield and Black ops variations up too?

Just a reminder, many roman and Greek events were played nude.

She should be more visible, show some respect

Until you realize that interference with the “timeline” means many of the battles never happen, new tactics can be countered, and modern logistics require strong communications - you have info on the wrong war.

A boomer with non-gps ICMS would literally make a world of difference. Hell, transporting a modern university and all its research, staff and equipment could make a world of difference. Include climate change results.