Quak, Quak, quuaakk
You joke, but have you heard about yacht support vessels. Essentially a second yacht for the personell to live and sleep on, and stow all the toys like jetskis so you have room for a bowling alley and other essentials on the parent yacht. It is also faster than the yacht in question, so they can clean up if the yacht leaves and arrive ahead of the parent on the new location to setup already.
Are they low on the specialised foam?
Or is it rossneft by way of qatar.?
You forgot to set your posts language buddy.
Buy some atacms and send them.
In the early 90, Putin was driving a taxi to make ends meat and their pilots where taking up american tourists for joyrides just so they could get in their flight hours… the collapse of the Soviet union was a wild ride.
Have you ever seen these insane little asshats on the online games that are able to drop Boms through windows in battlefield. A skilled pilot can do stuff we mere mortals can’t even dream of. And maybe they use an aimbot too.
80s air defense keeping the big planes out… so we get smaller planes to do it.
This makes me wonder where the sweetspot is in terms of size… what can you get away with, without it being shot down by strela or toe… but has the biggest carrying capacity.
Although these small ones can fit in an SUV easy.
It must absolutely suck that you spent the last decade pretending you are training while your commander sells the gas you would have used training only to be sent to the front to be sent back a 300 by a 400 euro drone carrying a 300 euro rpg round. 🌻
The arms manufacturers are in the find out stage. The government is barely hurt by this. But it’s as corpos say, money can easily move… they forgot to move their money into a better country… Now they are SOL.
Because actually optimizing games is hard, but hiring many graphic artists to make it look pretty not so much.
1 week later… olenya airbase is targeted… at 1800km.
Swiss arms manufacturers in the find out portion. The whole of the EU should follow suit. Swiss banks should also be cracked down on.
300km from the front leaves a hell of a logistics gap. Although dozens of burning migs and sukhois would have been better.
Working out… probably some dos and donts. I have no clue how the restrictions are enshrined in a law or something… and possibly arranging some more stocks if the use case is expanded.
It’s game theory 101. And it is maybe designed to ramp up domestic pressure.
Tit for tat. You mistreat our POW’s we take away a privilege of Russian POWs.
A statement to the Russian population… like treating civilians in Kursk with decency and bringing them supplies. Like only targeting military relevant targets instead of schools, hospitals, or even double tapping sites to hit first responders and the like?
Ukraine has systematically not targeted civilians and stated multiple times they go after valid military targets only. Their NATO partners also require this of them.
On the other hand, Russia keeps claiming they shot down targets or jammed targets that than still ended up on the targeted objective (they are very, very, very unlucky apparently) but then if a weapon would end up on an actual civilian structure… the Ukranians did it on purpose… Like sure…
This is a non starter… holding Ukraine to a high standard is important… But with their long list of actual military targets, I don’t see them allocating resources to hitting civilian targets… except maybe one of Putin’s villas… to make a point.
For sure… but limiting the use case to for example exclude 40tons or armor is already something.
It not really important though, I was just thinking out loud and am sure the Ukranians do the same… or have even tested it already.
If it was good and practical we would most likely already see it done. Like the new dragon’s breath drones.
Yeah we live in a world that has people dying of hunger while at the same time CEO’s have yacht support vessels and private planes for LA to Seattle commutes.