• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s not the same.

    Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I read that as if a person in poverty is receiving public assistance, parents or children may be responsible for some of that cost.

    Not the same as inheriting debt

    • socphoenix@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s still owing money for something I would have never had a say in so call it whatever you want but it meets the definition of debt.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s similar to child support. In many states, if a child is in poverty and receiving services, the state claims the right to collect from parents, regardless of circumstances or prior judgements. It doesn’t seem entirely fair but there is a similar connection here, and it is explicitly for care while alive that you owe while they are alive. It does not cover debt incurred nor is it inheriting: you owed it all along