The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 10 days agoA step too farlemmy.worldimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1971arrow-down110
arrow-up1961arrow-down1imageA step too farlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-squarePogbom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 days agoAlso tomatoes are fruits so suck it Italy
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoI’ll give them that one because they taste like they should be vegetables but science says otherwise.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·9 days agoOtoh the fruit/veggie dinstinction is from culinary tradition and has nothing to do with botanical sciences.
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoThat’s interesting. It’s like how peanuts are legumes and not nuts. But I feel like that makes sense because of the pods.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoYeah and they grow in the ground too. A distinction that I find more entertaining than the fruit/veggie one is the berry category. blueberry: not a berry blackberry: nuh-uh Strawberry: you’re an accessory fruit banana: yup, totally a berry watermelon: go for it That’s nuts
minus-squareLavenderDay3544@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoWho makes these rules? They’re so unintuitive.
minus-squareShapillon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoThese rules are made by botanists. A berry is a fleshy fruit without a pit produced by a single flower containing a single ovary. This definition is different from the colloquial culinary one which refers to anything small, growing on a small plant or bush and without a pit.
minus-squareBertuccio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 days agoI don’t particularly mind the culinary fruit/vegetable definition, but feel like sweet fruits/savory fruits/vegetables would have been clearer.
Also tomatoes are fruits so suck it Italy
I’ll give them that one because they taste like they should be vegetables but science says otherwise.
Otoh the fruit/veggie dinstinction is from culinary tradition and has nothing to do with botanical sciences.
That’s interesting.
It’s like how peanuts are legumes and not nuts. But I feel like that makes sense because of the pods.
Yeah and they grow in the ground too.
A distinction that I find more entertaining than the fruit/veggie one is the berry category.
That’s nuts
Who makes these rules? They’re so unintuitive.
These rules are made by botanists.
A berry is a fleshy fruit without a pit produced by a single flower containing a single ovary.
This definition is different from the colloquial culinary one which refers to anything small, growing on a small plant or bush and without a pit.
I don’t particularly mind the culinary fruit/vegetable definition, but feel like sweet fruits/savory fruits/vegetables would have been clearer.
Durian would’ve been a fruitable :p